AI transcript

Rancho Mirage City Council Meeting, May 15, 2025

This transcript is generated from the meeting video and may contain errors. Visit the official agenda, packet, and minutes for official content.

AI transcript

This transcript is generated from the meeting video and may contain errors. Visit the official agenda, packet, and minutes for official content.

City
Rancho Mirage
Date
2025-05-15
Meeting body
City Council
Review status
Not attached

Transcript text

AI transcript text.

[00:00:12] Good
[00:00:14] afternoon. It is a little after
[00:00:17] 1:00 on Thursday, May 15th.
[00:00:21] This is the regular meeting of the
[00:00:22] Rancher Mirage City Council and
[00:00:25] Community Services District, Energy
[00:00:28] Authority, Housing Authority, Joint
[00:00:31] Powers, Finance Authority, Library and
[00:00:34] Observatory, and Redevelopment Successor
[00:00:37] Agency
[00:00:39] boards. I will now ask you to join me in
[00:00:44] saluting our great
[00:00:47] country. Please join me. I pledge
[00:00:50] algiance to the flag of the United
[00:00:53] States of America and to the republic
[00:00:55] for which it stands. One nation under
[00:00:58] God, indivisible, with liberty and
[00:01:01] justice for all.
[00:01:09] And we have roll call, please.
[00:01:12] Council member DS, I'm here. Council
[00:01:14] member Framberg Edelstein, here. Council
[00:01:16] member O'Keefe, here. Mayor Prom Molatto
[00:01:19] I am here. Mayor while here
[00:01:31] I will now go to
[00:01:33] uh we're going to go to council com.
[00:01:36] Yeah, we will start out with council
[00:01:39] member comments today. Mayor, we do have
[00:01:42] a public comment on this item. So if you
[00:01:44] take that now Brad Anderson.
[00:01:55] Hello. Uh my name is Brad Anderson. I
[00:01:57] currently live in the city of Anz. I
[00:01:59] wanted to speak on the uh item number
[00:02:01] two this week. Uh they move around
[00:02:03] apparently. I would suggest that maybe
[00:02:06] this could be predictable uh council
[00:02:08] comments on a certain agenda item in the
[00:02:10] future. Uh but item number two is the
[00:02:13] council member comments and reports. U
[00:02:16] I've spoken before about maybe having uh
[00:02:19] uh public comment after you have your
[00:02:22] comments uh because it kind of defeats
[00:02:24] the purpose. But knowing that you would
[00:02:26] do this or assuming that you would do
[00:02:28] that this week, uh I went ahead and
[00:02:30] submitted some actually everything I'll
[00:02:32] be speaking on today I submitted written
[00:02:34] comments to and they should be in the
[00:02:36] record. And uh I'm going to go ahead and
[00:02:39] uh just uh voice my uh my commentary I
[00:02:43] guess about the comments at the not the
[00:02:45] most recent but at the May 1st uh
[00:02:47] council member meeting. Uh this is when
[00:02:50] Mr. DS council member DS u commented on
[00:02:53] the CV link and affordable housing or
[00:02:55] social housing aspects and hospital
[00:02:58] staff or having
[00:03:00] uh accommodations for Eisenhower
[00:03:03] Hospital. Uh because of that uh I want
[00:03:05] to just address that uh
[00:03:07] momentarily. I know the uh um I guess
[00:03:12] the affordable housing or social housing
[00:03:14] I would call it because it's really low
[00:03:16] income housing uh probably wouldn't be
[00:03:19] uh suitable for Eisenhower and most of
[00:03:22] the staff I would think most of the
[00:03:24] staff are traveling staff but that I
[00:03:26] don't know that for a fact. Uh so those
[00:03:29] aspects need to be addressed and uh the
[00:03:32] the mayor made a statement at the last
[00:03:35] or the May 1st meeting too about bicycle
[00:03:37] safety and that's that's all good and
[00:03:39] well and I and I commend him for doing
[00:03:41] that. But I think the uh the pretext of
[00:03:45] that was actually the death of a cyclist
[00:03:47] right outside city hall. But nothing's
[00:03:50] being addressed to u mitigate that risk
[00:03:53] to bike sickers. Uh but I'm sure it's
[00:03:55] coming and if they could do announcement
[00:03:57] on that that would be great. Uh and uh
[00:04:00] that's really all I wanted to talk about
[00:04:03] the budget meeting. You had some issues
[00:04:04] there and I'll make comments to those
[00:04:07] later on. And um and hopefully uh during
[00:04:11] the comments today, you can uh you can
[00:04:14] voice
[00:04:15] uh I guess uh make an announcement of
[00:04:18] the meeting you're going to have at 4:30
[00:04:19] concerning the housing authority or
[00:04:21] housing authority of the city which
[00:04:23] you're having a meeting representing
[00:04:25] this board right now, but you're going
[00:04:26] to have another special meeting at 4:30
[00:04:28] today, I believe. So if you can make
[00:04:30] that announcement, maybe people would
[00:04:32] know about it. Thank you. Thank you for
[00:04:34] your comment.
[00:04:36] Are there any other that that was the
[00:04:38] only speaker Carter? Is there anyone
[00:04:40] else who would like to speak on this
[00:04:41] item? That was the only speaker. Okay,
[00:04:44] we will now go to council comments and
[00:04:46] I'll start on my left with Eve from
[00:04:49] birdstein.
[00:04:50] Thank you, mayor. So, I attended the
[00:04:53] CEAG public safety committee meeting on
[00:04:56] Monday the 19th and there was has been
[00:04:59] considerable work and research done
[00:05:01] regarding the 911 outages throughout the
[00:05:03] Coachella Valley, especially during
[00:05:05] natural disasters.
[00:05:07] Making a presentation were Riverside
[00:05:08] County Sheriff's Office Communication
[00:05:10] Director Tim Buckfeller, Sheriff's
[00:05:13] Captain Steve Favo, CalFire Deputy
[00:05:16] Director Chad Ashba, and California
[00:05:19] Offices of Emergency Services 911 Tech
[00:05:22] Division Chief Ryan Sunahara and
[00:05:26] Assistant Chief of Technology uh Don
[00:05:29] Jones. What was interesting was that
[00:05:31] robust testing of current systems was
[00:05:33] done by these offices and through CAVAG
[00:05:36] to discover what went wrong during
[00:05:38] during Hurricane Hillary that caused the
[00:05:41] 911 outage that plagued many cities in
[00:05:43] the Coachella Valley. It was discovered
[00:05:45] that many failures occurred not totally
[00:05:48] due to the existing statewide 911
[00:05:50] system, but a failure of equipment
[00:05:52] belonging to private companies such as
[00:05:54] AT&T and Verizon, a lack of cell towers
[00:05:57] and damage to fiber fiber connectivity
[00:06:00] due to theft or accident. Local cities
[00:06:03] took the brunt of the blame, but the
[00:06:04] fault of failure really lies with
[00:06:06] private the private companies and their
[00:06:08] networks. I spoke about our wireless
[00:06:10] study and its findings and I
[00:06:12] specifically asked the gentleman who
[00:06:14] spoke if more towers would help aid the
[00:06:16] uh in solving the problem. They said
[00:06:19] yes, more towers always
[00:06:21] help. Specifically, when you use your
[00:06:24] cell phone to call 911, as the private
[00:06:26] companies expand their cellular
[00:06:28] networks, connectivity and location
[00:06:30] notification greatly improves. Further,
[00:06:32] it's important for residents to know
[00:06:34] that our extensive wireless study and
[00:06:36] our action to modify our municipal code
[00:06:38] to reduce the process for new towers
[00:06:40] will aid in getting more towers. Should
[00:06:43] that that als that should also make 911
[00:06:45] more reliable. I also mentioned to the
[00:06:47] other cities that were there that if
[00:06:49] they wanted assistance with what we did
[00:06:51] with our code, we would be happy to
[00:06:53] share with them. It was further said
[00:06:55] that there are plans to shift to the
[00:06:57] 911, the next generation 911 system
[00:07:00] across the state, which will increase
[00:07:02] resiliency and provide common technology
[00:07:05] across California, allowing agencies to
[00:07:08] reroute 911 calls to each other during
[00:07:11] disasters, so if there's failures, they
[00:07:13] can log into other networks. It will
[00:07:15] also improve location services and
[00:07:17] integrate a nationwide broadband network
[00:07:20] initiative. However, this pro program is
[00:07:23] on hold. uh with the state currently.
[00:07:25] Unfortunately, and again, without the
[00:07:28] involvement of those private carriers to
[00:07:29] work with the 911 system, these types of
[00:07:32] outages may continue due to no fault of
[00:07:34] your local municipality or the county.
[00:07:36] The best takeaway from the presentation,
[00:07:39] though, is that 911 can be contacted in
[00:07:42] four ways. Number one, landline or
[00:07:44] analog, which some of us have and most
[00:07:46] of us don't. Two, voiceover internet
[00:07:48] protocol or VIP.
[00:07:51] three cellular and wireless phones, but
[00:07:54] most importantly four by text, which is
[00:07:58] amazing. And it simply requires you to
[00:08:00] text
[00:08:01] 911. Uh when you do that text, they do
[00:08:04] ask you to provide your location and
[00:08:05] then they can track and find you. Uh
[00:08:08] they said the 911 texts are actually
[00:08:10] very very reliable and work better than
[00:08:12] cell calls in most instances. So per
[00:08:16] calos text is very reliable. It is also
[00:08:19] recommended to know the local phone
[00:08:21] numbers for your law enforcement offices
[00:08:24] should your 911 not be accessible. And I
[00:08:26] just thought that was really valuable
[00:08:28] information for citizens. Thank you.
[00:08:31] That's great. Well, thank you. Um, from
[00:08:34] a a personal standpoint, uh, I would not
[00:08:38] have thought about texting 911. I mean,
[00:08:42] I think that's a a wonderful
[00:08:44] contribution and um extremely valuable.
[00:08:48] That's terrific. Thank you so much. Um
[00:08:52] Council Member O'Keefe. Thank you, Mr.
[00:08:54] Mayor. No comments today.
[00:08:57] We'll go now to Council Member DS.
[00:09:02] Thank you, Mr. Mayor. So I am the city's
[00:09:04] representative on the board for the
[00:09:07] Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy
[00:09:10] and our last board meeting was just last
[00:09:12] Monday. Uh and so what uh what we did at
[00:09:16] that board meeting was we passed out the
[00:09:18] annual report for the Mountains
[00:09:19] Conservancy. This is the annual report
[00:09:21] and I want to talk today about some
[00:09:23] highlights from that annual report. The
[00:09:26] mission of the consery is to protect and
[00:09:28] steward land in
[00:09:30] perpetuity and provide for the public's
[00:09:32] enjoyment and access to those lands. And
[00:09:34] the district extends from the banning
[00:09:36] pass to the Riverside County border of
[00:09:39] the Sultan Sea. But before I talk about
[00:09:42] the annual report from the mountains
[00:09:43] conservancy, I want to contrast that
[00:09:46] with some comments that we have received
[00:09:48] over time about Cotino. There have been
[00:09:52] some who have suggested that Cotino
[00:09:54] should have remained open space. Now, I
[00:09:56] disagree and here's why. This is a 618
[00:09:59] acre parcel that has been zoned for
[00:10:01] commercial and residential use, not just
[00:10:03] for years, but for decades. In fact, in
[00:10:06] the early 2000s, there was an approval
[00:10:08] to build a residential and hotel and
[00:10:12] golf course project on that land, which
[00:10:14] died with the 2008 uh great recession.
[00:10:19] Um and it took some years for another um
[00:10:24] investor to come along to purchase that
[00:10:25] land. Now that land is in the center of
[00:10:28] the city of Ranch Mirage, which means
[00:10:30] that it's in the center of the Coachella
[00:10:32] Valley and it always has been one of the
[00:10:34] most logical parcels of land for
[00:10:37] development in this city and in this
[00:10:39] valley for decades. It's in the economic
[00:10:41] best interests of Rancher Mirage to
[00:10:43] develop this parcel. Now, that said,
[00:10:45] it's also important to conserve open
[00:10:47] desert land for future generations and
[00:10:50] habitat
[00:10:51] protection. So, here are some of the
[00:10:53] highlights from the Coachella Valley
[00:10:55] Mountains Conservancy annual report. In
[00:10:58] 2024, the conservancy made award grants
[00:11:01] in the amount of $1.9 million. Now,
[00:11:03] these were grants to manage and protect
[00:11:05] land already owned and conserved. Now,
[00:11:07] over the years, more than 100,000 acres
[00:11:10] of land have been acquired and set aside
[00:11:12] for conservation by the commission and
[00:11:15] its partners, and about 200 acres of
[00:11:17] land were acquired just in 2024 alone.
[00:11:21] So, here's a map. Can we put that map up
[00:11:23] on the screen? There's a map for you of
[00:11:25] all of the land that is currently owned
[00:11:28] and managed by the conservancy. You can
[00:11:30] see all those blue dots which are all
[00:11:31] over the Coachella Valley. And that
[00:11:34] gives you some idea of the scope of the
[00:11:37] operations uh for the mountains
[00:11:40] conservancy. Now uh the u this annual
[00:11:43] report I'll give a copy by PDF. I'll
[00:11:46] send a copy by PDF to my council
[00:11:48] colleagues and to staff. I'll give this
[00:11:49] copy to uh our director of marketing
[00:11:51] Gabe Coding. Gabe, maybe that's
[00:11:53] appropriate uh use for our next Ranch
[00:11:56] Mirage News. Maybe a download of the
[00:11:58] report for our residents. And I'll close
[00:12:00] with uh these thoughts today. It is
[00:12:02] critically important to manage lands
[00:12:05] that can provide a vibrant economic
[00:12:07] future for our city. That's what we did
[00:12:10] in improving 618 acres at Cotino. It is
[00:12:13] also critically important to conserve
[00:12:15] land for public enjoyment and wildlife
[00:12:18] habitat and that's what we do in our
[00:12:20] support for the more than 100,000 acres
[00:12:24] owned by the Coachella Valley Mountains
[00:12:26] Conservancy. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Thank
[00:12:29] you. Uh now on I call upon mayor proam
[00:12:34] mo mayor protowel molatto. Thank you Mr.
[00:12:39] Mayor. You know daily residents and
[00:12:42] business owners will contact council
[00:12:44] members. We run into each other and have
[00:12:46] discussion what's happening on the
[00:12:48] various projects that are occurring
[00:12:50] through the city. And uh to piggyback on
[00:12:54] uh Council Member D's comments about
[00:12:57] Cotino, often is the case. Residents
[00:13:00] will say, "We don't see much movement
[00:13:02] going on in there. It it's they're not
[00:13:04] selling." Well, I'm I'm very very
[00:13:07] pleased to announce a a big
[00:13:10] congratulations to the Cotino
[00:13:12] development. On May 7th, they had 13
[00:13:16] closings, 13 homes that were delivered
[00:13:19] to new homeowners in the Cotino
[00:13:21] development. So, congratulations not
[00:13:23] only to the developers, but to the new
[00:13:25] homeowners and welcome to Ranch Mirage.
[00:13:28] Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Thank you. Have
[00:13:30] they uh uh at this point uh isn't there
[00:13:35] some uh homes that have been occupied to
[00:13:38] date? It's my understanding. Yes. Yeah.
[00:13:42] No, it's a it's a community that's
[00:13:44] coming to life very quickly without a
[00:13:47] doubt. I'll make these brief comments
[00:13:50] that
[00:13:51] um today I'm honored to commend
[00:13:54] Eisenhower Health
[00:13:57] uh for its exceptional celebration of
[00:13:59] National Nurses Week.
[00:14:02] This meaningful tribute begins on May
[00:14:05] 6th through May 12th and stands as a
[00:14:08] powerful acknowledgment of the
[00:14:10] dedication, compassion, and
[00:14:14] tireless work of nursing professionals,
[00:14:17] not only in our community, but across
[00:14:20] the
[00:14:21] nation. Throughout the week, Eisenhower
[00:14:24] Health organized a series of thoughtful
[00:14:27] and uplifting events, all designed to
[00:14:30] express the deep appreciation and hold
[00:14:34] for our N
[00:14:36] nurses. The following video captures the
[00:14:39] spirit of this celebration with great
[00:14:42] warmth. It serves as a heartfelt
[00:14:45] reminder of the vital role nurses play
[00:14:49] in our health care system and the
[00:14:52] lasting impact they make on the lives of
[00:14:56] so many. We are truly thankful for their
[00:15:00] extraordinary service. If you will
[00:15:03] kindly play the video.
[00:15:08] Thank you so much to the amazing nurses,
[00:15:09] not just in our organization, but across
[00:15:11] our valley and across the country. Ben
[00:15:13] Farber, VP of patient care and chief
[00:15:15] nursing officer, Eisenhower Health. We
[00:15:17] are in one of our units at Eisenhower
[00:15:19] Health getting ready for National Nurses
[00:15:20] Week starting today and ending May 12th.
[00:15:23] National Nurses Week is one of my
[00:15:24] favorite weeks because we get to honor
[00:15:26] the work that nurses do, not only in our
[00:15:28] organization, but across the country as
[00:15:30] the largest portion of healthcare
[00:15:31] workers. And as many people who have had
[00:15:34] the unfortunate experience of
[00:15:35] hospitalization know, they're the faces
[00:15:37] that they see the most frequently while
[00:15:38] they're hospitalized. So nurses really
[00:15:40] are the people who are helping to make
[00:15:41] sure that everything that you need is
[00:15:43] taken care of while you're in the
[00:15:44] healthcare industry and escalating needs
[00:15:46] to your physicians. I do what I do and I
[00:15:48] love what I do and I just I come every
[00:15:51] day because I want to make someone's
[00:15:52] life better. It's innate in nature and
[00:15:55] to become a nurse you have to be caring.
[00:15:58] You know, you need to have a caring
[00:15:59] heart. I think nursing is definitely a
[00:16:02] safe space for us and we are a very
[00:16:04] powerful group and that's why I joined.
[00:16:05] We have events throughout the week.
[00:16:07] Today we started with our t-shirt
[00:16:08] distribution and then we also have
[00:16:10] lunches planned for nurses throughout
[00:16:11] the week as well as an ice cream day
[00:16:13] culminating on Monday with the unveiling
[00:16:16] of our new Daisy Garden uh celebrating
[00:16:18] our Daisy Award winners and nurses
[00:16:20] throughout the healthcare organization.
[00:16:21] I get really really excited about these
[00:16:23] weeks because it means that I get to
[00:16:25] really truly honor my team in a way that
[00:16:27] I can't do every day even though I want
[00:16:30] to. So they truly get the attention that
[00:16:32] they need for the work that they do
[00:16:34] during this week.
[00:16:39] That's wonderful. It's great to honor
[00:16:40] the nurses. They do extraordinary job.
[00:16:44] Uh and we're we're extremely proud of
[00:16:48] the job that Eisenhower does. We're
[00:16:50] fortunate to have them located in uh the
[00:16:53] city of Rancho
[00:16:55] Mirage. Uh that concludes our council
[00:16:58] comments. Uh council member comments.
[00:17:01] I'll ask the city manager for any
[00:17:03] comments. Uh and if he has none, we will
[00:17:07] then go directly in to the consent
[00:17:09] calendar.
[00:17:11] Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Uh no comments
[00:17:12] today, so we will go right to the
[00:17:14] consent calendar. Uh the council has six
[00:17:17] items on the consent calendar for
[00:17:19] consideration. Item 4 A is to wave the
[00:17:22] full reading of all ordinances
[00:17:24] introduced or adopted pursuant to this
[00:17:26] agenda. Item 4 B is to approve the May
[00:17:30] 1st, 2025 regular city council meeting
[00:17:33] minutes. Item 4 C is to receive and file
[00:17:36] the general plan annual progress report
[00:17:39] for 2024. Item 4 D is to adopt a a
[00:17:43] resolution uh noting compliance with
[00:17:46] Senate Bill one eligibility requirements
[00:17:49] by approving the road maintenance and
[00:17:50] rehabilitation account project list.
[00:17:53] Item 4E are to approve the contracts.
[00:17:56] Item 4F are demands. And before we go to
[00:17:58] council comments or questions, I'll ask
[00:18:00] the city clerk to take any public
[00:18:02] comment on the consent calendar. Brad
[00:18:04] Anderson.
[00:18:10] Hello. Uh, thank you again, Brad
[00:18:11] Anderson, City of Ranch. I wanted to
[00:18:13] speak on item number
[00:18:15] 4B. As concerning the May 1st regular
[00:18:18] city council meeting minutes, written
[00:18:20] minutes.
[00:18:21] Uh, as the city is aware that they
[00:18:23] changed their format or the process of
[00:18:25] how they record minutes and and it's
[00:18:28] censored a lot of, uh, testimony, a lot
[00:18:31] of everybody's testimony, but mostly the
[00:18:33] public's uh, that attends uh, city
[00:18:36] meetings. Uh so anyway, I wanted to I
[00:18:39] did write some uh comments and I think
[00:18:42] there was three in inconsistencies that
[00:18:44] I found uh on those staff reports. Uh
[00:18:48] and hopefully you can address those.
[00:18:49] Thank you.
[00:18:51] Thank you for your comments. Is there
[00:18:53] anyone else who would like to speak?
[00:18:55] That was the only speaker.
[00:18:58] Are there any uh council comments
[00:19:01] regarding the consent calendar?
[00:19:05] Seeing none, I will entertain a motion.
[00:19:08] I'll make up the motion that we um
[00:19:11] approve the consent calendar as read by
[00:19:12] the city manager. Second. There's a
[00:19:15] motion and a second. Please vote.
[00:19:32] Motion carries. 50.
[00:19:34] We will now go to the first item under
[00:19:37] public hearings and it's a zoning text
[00:19:41] amendment case
[00:19:44] number
[00:19:49] ZTA-25-01 and that will be presented by
[00:19:52] Ben Torres, our planning manager. Ben,
[00:19:55] if you would please. Uh good afternoon,
[00:19:57] mayor and city council members. Uh for
[00:19:59] your consideration today we have uh
[00:20:01] zoning text amendment case number Z
[00:20:02] ETA25-00001
[00:20:06] uh which we refer to as the omnibus
[00:20:08] ordinance as it contains multiple
[00:20:09] amendments to our current municipal
[00:20:10] code.
[00:20:12] Uh the primary purpose of this omnibus
[00:20:14] ordinance is to introduce certain
[00:20:15] amendments to title two administration
[00:20:18] and personnel, title five, businesses,
[00:20:21] taxes, licenses and regulations, title 8
[00:20:24] health and safety, title 14 code
[00:20:27] compliance and remedies and title 17
[00:20:29] zoning of the rancher mirage municipal
[00:20:31] code as further detailed in the proposed
[00:20:33] ordinance. As part of regular municipal
[00:20:36] code maintenance, updates into chapters
[00:20:38] and sections are occasionally required
[00:20:40] to update uh standards and ensure that
[00:20:42] the municipal code complies with new
[00:20:45] regulations. On March 6, 2025, the city
[00:20:48] council received and filed the wireless
[00:20:50] master plan which contained key data and
[00:20:52] recommendations on how to improve
[00:20:54] cellular coverage within the city. Uh
[00:20:56] staff was directed to initiate the
[00:20:58] necessary municipal code amendments to
[00:21:00] streamline the permitting process and to
[00:21:02] reduce barriers to entitlement for
[00:21:04] wireless communication facilities. Uh
[00:21:06] the proposed revisions to chapter 17.32
[00:21:08] achieve these objectives. Other
[00:21:11] amendments are proposed to title 17 to
[00:21:13] clarify regulations and the review
[00:21:15] authority. Uh the planning commission on
[00:21:17] April 24th, 2025 reviewed and adopted
[00:21:20] resolution number 2025
[00:21:23] PC04 recommending the title 17
[00:21:25] amendments which are under the planning
[00:21:27] commission's
[00:21:30] perview. Additionally, amendments are
[00:21:32] proposed to titles 2, 5, 8, and 14,
[00:21:35] which correct references, clarify review
[00:21:38] authority, uh modify enforcement, and
[00:21:41] establish a shopping cart management
[00:21:42] program for
[00:21:44] retailers. Uh, with that, staff
[00:21:46] recommends that the city council make
[00:21:47] the recommendation shown on screen or as
[00:21:50] listed in the staff report. That
[00:21:51] concludes my presentation. I'd be happy
[00:21:53] to answer any questions. Thank you.
[00:21:56] Thank you, ma'am. Uh, are there any
[00:21:58] public comments? Yes, I have one speaker
[00:22:00] card from Brad Anderson.
[00:22:06] Thank you again, Brad Anderson, city. I
[00:22:09] wanted to speak on this public hearing
[00:22:11] item today. Um I did again I did submit
[00:22:15] written statements uh concerning this
[00:22:17] agenda item. Uh there's a lot of
[00:22:20] inconsistencies with this too. Uh I did
[00:22:23] uh during the planning uh committee
[00:22:25] portion of this public hearing of this
[00:22:28] item. Um I did write uh comments to
[00:22:31] those and submit testimony to in person
[00:22:34] I believe.
[00:22:35] uh but that wasn't really addressed in
[00:22:38] the staff report or the minutes uh or
[00:22:41] this agenda item. So I'm I'm really
[00:22:43] concerned the way the city is censoring
[00:22:45] public comment it impedes public
[00:22:48] hearings. So this is a big issue. I
[00:22:51] think it is um and and you should too. I
[00:22:53] believe uh because uh the public uh is
[00:22:57] left out of these type of decisions now
[00:22:59] the way the city u is man mandating
[00:23:02] their their responses I guess. Um but
[00:23:04] anyway, uh there's a few things the
[00:23:06] wireless plan um I'm not a proponent of
[00:23:10] that mainly because of how the city is
[00:23:12] doing it. It gives most people probably
[00:23:15] don't know that the city manager is
[00:23:17] really uh has a lot more authority of uh
[00:23:21] approving these type of installations in
[00:23:24] the city and around residential
[00:23:26] neighborhoods. Uh so the public may not
[00:23:29] even know that these facilities go in.
[00:23:31] Now, uh, that's my main thing. There's a
[00:23:34] lot, this is kind of a cleanup thing.
[00:23:35] There's nothing wrong with this, but
[00:23:37] every time this happens, it takes a
[00:23:39] little bit of freedom, a little bit of a
[00:23:42] little bit of a quality of life away
[00:23:45] from every resident that lives in this
[00:23:46] city. uh just these little definitions
[00:23:49] like uh I think in my comments, my
[00:23:52] written comments, I submitted something
[00:23:53] about parks and no more than 30 people
[00:23:56] at a time in any park other than the uh
[00:24:00] Whitewater Park or you be named, I
[00:24:02] guess. But um and I think you have to
[00:24:05] have a special permit to do that. Uh
[00:24:07] that's not I understand the premise of
[00:24:10] that but uh I remember during the co
[00:24:14] crisis uh uh well yoga was uh illegal in
[00:24:18] parks. Uh it's just nonsensical this
[00:24:20] type of
[00:24:21] uh mandates. So anyway, uh and I did
[00:24:25] bring u I was going to bring a sampler
[00:24:28] of my research around these cellular
[00:24:30] antennas or palm tree looking things cuz
[00:24:34] they're all debris that uh that leaves
[00:24:37] the boundary of those uh areas and on
[00:24:39] adjacent properties and I have those as
[00:24:43] exhibits and I have photographs too and
[00:24:45] maybe I can bring those at a different
[00:24:46] date uh when litigation begins. So, u
[00:24:50] hopefully I don't have to, but they are
[00:24:55] protectors, I guess, u items that could
[00:24:57] harm people from those and and and let
[00:25:00] alone uh mitigating other other I guess
[00:25:04] things that could happen. And that's it.
[00:25:06] Thank you. Thank you for your comments.
[00:25:09] Is there anyone else that would like to
[00:25:11] speak on item 5A?
[00:25:14] Okay. Please state your name.
[00:25:20] Good afternoon, uh, Mr. Mayor, city
[00:25:23] council, and staff. My name is Bill
[00:25:26] Reon. I live in Rancho Mirage. Some of
[00:25:29] you know me from my past experiences.
[00:25:32] Anyway, I have a question concerning
[00:25:35] chapter
[00:25:36] 8.25, landing of
[00:25:38] aircraft. And I'm not sure what that's
[00:25:41] about. As you may, some of you may
[00:25:43] recall, I retired from the state
[00:25:45] division of aeronautics.
[00:25:47] uh which uh regulates all the airports
[00:25:50] in the state including what we used to
[00:25:53] call or we called when I was there uh
[00:25:56] temporary airport permit. Every airport
[00:25:59] in in the state requires a state airport
[00:26:01] permit to operate. Any off airport
[00:26:04] landing requires a special airport
[00:26:08] permit and one of the requirements is
[00:26:11] local government approval which uh
[00:26:13] obviously is the is the city but it also
[00:26:17] requires approval by the state division
[00:26:21] of
[00:26:22] aeronautics. Most people are not aware
[00:26:24] of uh of this requirement. It's a It's a
[00:26:28] statute. And anyway, just uh be aware
[00:26:31] that uh uh any landing of aircraft, I'm
[00:26:35] not sure what that chapter says about
[00:26:38] landing of aircraft. If the staff member
[00:26:41] has that information, I'm kind of
[00:26:43] curious.
[00:26:46] We can't respond to your questions.
[00:26:48] Okay. I'm sorry. Anyway, just uh kind of
[00:26:51] curious about landing and let city know
[00:26:54] that there are requirements of the state
[00:26:58] uh to allow landing of aircraft uh uh
[00:27:04] not at an airport. Thank you. Thank you.
[00:27:09] Is there anyone else who would like to
[00:27:10] speak? That was the last speaker. All
[00:27:13] right. Uh, mayor, uh, if you wouldn't
[00:27:16] mind, I'd like to ask, uh, Ben Torres,
[00:27:18] our planning manager, to,
[00:27:21] uh, address the public comment. Um, so
[00:27:24] the section that, uh, you were referring
[00:27:26] to regarding the landing aircraft, uh,
[00:27:29] the only modification we're doing is
[00:27:30] just adding or as determined by the
[00:27:32] development services director. uh but uh
[00:27:34] for landing of aircraft uh we take a
[00:27:36] look at uh FAA regulations to make sure
[00:27:39] that they have proper u authorization
[00:27:41] for any landings.
[00:27:43] Council members, if I can also add that
[00:27:45] we're not changing or um it doesn't
[00:27:48] affect any state regulations. It's just
[00:27:50] our local municipal code that's um being
[00:27:53] slightly modified.
[00:27:55] So they have to meet state regulations
[00:27:57] and our local municipal code. Correct.
[00:28:02] Thank
[00:28:04] you. Any other uh comments? Uh council
[00:28:11] comments. If there are no other council
[00:28:13] comments, I'll ask for a motion.
[00:28:17] I'll be happy to do the motion, but I
[00:28:18] have a question. Uh is it possible for
[00:28:20] me instead of reading all of this to
[00:28:22] simply refer to the staff's
[00:28:24] recommendation? Is that acceptable? You
[00:28:26] may. Okay. Then I will make the motion
[00:28:29] that we approve the uh om omnibus
[00:28:32] ordinance as as uh recommended by staff.
[00:28:39] I'll second. There's a motion and a
[00:28:41] second. Please vote.
[00:28:49] Waiting for one vote. Still
[00:28:53] touch your screen. There you go.
[00:28:56] Motion carries. 50.
[00:28:59] Thank you. That motion is approved.
[00:29:02] We will now go to
[00:29:04] um 5B, extension of time case number
[00:29:11] ET25-LE1, and that will be presented by
[00:29:14] Joy Sai, our senior planner. Joy, if you
[00:29:17] would, please.
[00:29:21] Thank you, mayor. Good afternoon, mayor
[00:29:23] and members of the city council. for
[00:29:25] your consideration. Today is an
[00:29:27] extension of time case number
[00:29:32] ET25-00001 for tenative track map number
[00:29:36] 38224. This is the first time extension
[00:29:39] request for this map. The applicant team
[00:29:42] has been working on final map uh
[00:29:44] submitts. This time extension would
[00:29:47] allow the project team additional time
[00:29:49] to coordinate with the Imperial
[00:29:51] Irrigation District to work on solutions
[00:29:53] regarding the electrical capacity issues
[00:29:55] in the district's service territory and
[00:29:58] to work on fulfilling the remaining
[00:29:59] final map requirements through city
[00:30:03] engineering. The project site is located
[00:30:05] in section 30 at the northeast corner of
[00:30:07] Via Hosaphina and Ginger Rogers
[00:30:12] Road. Tenative track map 38224 proposes
[00:30:16] to subdivide 4.77 acres into nine single
[00:30:20] family residential lots and common lots
[00:30:23] for a private street and landscape
[00:30:25] retention basins. This tenative map was
[00:30:28] approved by the city council in February
[00:30:34] 2023. As a part of this extension
[00:30:36] request, staff is recommending changes
[00:30:38] to the conditions of approval.
[00:30:41] The first is to revise condition of
[00:30:43] approval number three to reflect the new
[00:30:45] approval expiration date. The second is
[00:30:48] to add condition of approval number 11
[00:30:50] stating that the grading permits shall
[00:30:52] not be issued prior to vertical
[00:30:54] development entitlements unless approved
[00:30:56] by the public works or development
[00:30:58] services
[00:31:01] director. Staff has not received any
[00:31:03] outside correspondence or comments
[00:31:05] regarding this request. On April 24,
[00:31:09] 2025, the planning commission
[00:31:11] recommended that the city council one
[00:31:14] approved the filing of a notice of
[00:31:15] exemption pursuant to SECA guidelines
[00:31:18] section 15162 for subsequent ERS and
[00:31:21] negative declarations and two approve a
[00:31:25] 2-year extension of time for tenative
[00:31:27] track map number case number
[00:31:32] TTM22-00003 subject to the conditions of
[00:31:34] approval and based on the content and
[00:31:36] findings in attached staff report. This
[00:31:39] concludes my presentation and I would be
[00:31:41] happy to address any questions the
[00:31:42] council may have. Thank you. Thank you,
[00:31:44] Joy. Are there any uh public comments? I
[00:31:48] did not receive any speaker cards for
[00:31:49] this item. Is there anyone who would
[00:31:51] like to speak regarding this public
[00:31:52] hearing item? No speakers. Thank you.
[00:31:56] I'll ask for any council comments
[00:31:59] regarding this item.
[00:32:03] Seeing none, uh, I'll entertain a
[00:32:06] motion, please.
[00:32:08] I'll make the motion, Mr. Mayor. Move to
[00:32:11] approve the filing of notice of
[00:32:13] exemption pursuant to the California
[00:32:16] Environmental Quality Act guidelines
[00:32:18] section 15162 subsequent ERS and
[00:32:21] negative declarations and two approve a
[00:32:24] 2-year extension of time
[00:32:28] ET25-00001 for tenative track map case
[00:32:31] number
[00:32:35] TTM22-00003 TTM
[00:32:38] 38224 subject to the conditions of
[00:32:40] approval and based on the content and
[00:32:42] findings in the attached staff report.
[00:32:44] And I'll second. There's a motion in a
[00:32:47] second. Please vote.
[00:32:53] Motion carries 5.
[00:32:57] Next item. Also, uh Joy is in her
[00:33:01] position ready to speak on environmental
[00:33:04] assessment case number
[00:33:09] EA22-01. If you would, Joy. Thank you
[00:33:12] again, mayor. Um, for your consideration
[00:33:15] today is a city initiated general plan
[00:33:18] text amendment to amend the city's
[00:33:20] safety element by incorporating the
[00:33:22] adopted local hazard mitigation plan
[00:33:24] update by reference in accordance with
[00:33:27] assembly bill
[00:33:30] 2140. AB 2140 is an optional state
[00:33:33] incentive to help cities become more
[00:33:35] resilient to natural hazards. Compliance
[00:33:38] with this bill would make the city
[00:33:39] eligible for additional recovery or part
[00:33:43] or all of its local share costs on
[00:33:45] eligible public assistance funding
[00:33:47] provided by the state through the
[00:33:49] California Disaster Assistance Act in in
[00:33:51] the event of a
[00:33:54] disaster. This slide here shows the
[00:33:56] steps that must be completed before the
[00:33:58] California Governor's Office of
[00:34:00] Emergency Services can deem the city in
[00:34:02] compliance with AB2140.
[00:34:05] The city has already completed the first
[00:34:07] two steps last year. The fir the current
[00:34:10] local hazard mitigation plan has been
[00:34:12] approved by FEMA and was adopted by the
[00:34:14] city council in September. Today's
[00:34:17] request is step number three, which is
[00:34:19] to amend the safety element by
[00:34:20] incorporating the adopted LHMP by
[00:34:23] reference and adding a link to the LHMP
[00:34:26] on the city's
[00:34:28] website. Staff has not received any
[00:34:30] outside correspondence or comments
[00:34:32] regarding this request. On April 24,
[00:34:35] 2025, the planning commission adopted a
[00:34:38] resolution recommending that the city
[00:34:39] council adopt resolution number next in
[00:34:42] order for the following. A find that the
[00:34:45] adoption of the updated safety element
[00:34:47] is not subject to SQA pursuant to SQA
[00:34:50] guidelines section
[00:34:53] 15061B3 general rule common sense
[00:34:55] exemption and B approve general plan
[00:34:58] text amendment case number GPTA
[00:35:02] 24-00001 incorporating by reference the
[00:35:05] 2023 LHMP into the safety element in the
[00:35:08] city's general plan in accordance with
[00:35:11] AB2140.
[00:35:13] This concludes my presentation and staff
[00:35:14] is available for questions. Thank you.
[00:35:17] Thank you, Joy. Are there any public
[00:35:19] comments regarding this item? I did not
[00:35:21] receive any speaker cards. Is there
[00:35:22] anyone in the audience who would like to
[00:35:24] speak on this public hearing item? No
[00:35:26] speakers.
[00:35:28] Okay. I'll ask for any council
[00:35:33] comments. All right. Since everybody's
[00:35:36] speaking at once, uh I will entertain a
[00:35:40] motion. Please be happy to make the
[00:35:42] motion that we adopt the resolution
[00:35:44] number 2025 next in order finding that
[00:35:47] the adoption and the safety element of
[00:35:49] the city's general plan is exempt from
[00:35:52] the California Environmental Quality Act
[00:35:54] SQA pursuant to SQA guideline section
[00:35:59] 15061B3 and approving general plan text
[00:36:02] amendment case number
[00:36:06] GPTA24-00001 incorporating by reference
[00:36:09] the 2020 23 local hazard mitigation plan
[00:36:12] into the safety element in the city's
[00:36:14] general plan in accordance with assembly
[00:36:16] bill 2140. Second. There's a motion and
[00:36:21] second. Please vote.
[00:36:26] Motion carries 5-0.
[00:36:29] Thank you. The next item up 5D is a
[00:36:34] updated fire hazard severity zone map.
[00:36:39] That'll presented by Tyler Folks, our
[00:36:41] senior management manager analyst.
[00:36:44] Tyler, if you would, please. Thank you,
[00:36:47] mayor. Good afternoon, mayor and members
[00:36:49] of the city council. I just want to make
[00:36:51] sure that Perfect Presentation's up
[00:36:54] there. This item concerns the adoption
[00:36:56] of the updated fire hazard severity
[00:36:59] zones map for the local responsibility
[00:37:01] area of Ranch Mirage as required by the
[00:37:04] California Department of Forestry and
[00:37:06] Fire Protection under state law.
[00:37:09] The California Department of Forest,
[00:37:11] Forestry and Fire Protection is
[00:37:13] responsible for classifying areas of the
[00:37:15] state into three categories of wildfire
[00:37:17] hazard moderate, high, and very high.
[00:37:21] These classifications are based strictly
[00:37:23] on natural factors such as vegetation,
[00:37:25] topography, and weather patterns. It is
[00:37:28] important to note that this map created
[00:37:30] by the state reflects wildfire hazard,
[00:37:32] which is not the same as risk. Hazard
[00:37:35] measures environmental conditions that
[00:37:37] influence how a fire behaves. Risk would
[00:37:40] also take into account development, fire
[00:37:42] prevention efforts, and firefighting
[00:37:44] capabilities, which are factors that are
[00:37:46] not included in this
[00:37:49] mapping. On March 24th, 2025, the city
[00:37:52] of Ranch Mirage received the finalized
[00:37:55] fire hazard severity zones map for its
[00:37:57] local responsibility area. In compliance
[00:38:00] with California law, we are required to
[00:38:02] adopt this map within 120 days,
[00:38:05] establishing a deadline of July 22nd. To
[00:38:08] ensure transparency and public
[00:38:09] engagement, the updated map was posted
[00:38:12] to the city's website on April 15th and
[00:38:14] was featured in multiple editions of the
[00:38:16] RM weekly newsletter. Public comments
[00:38:18] collected during the review period are
[00:38:20] included in today's agenda packet for
[00:38:22] your consideration. The updated fire
[00:38:24] hazard severity zones map identifies
[00:38:27] portions of the city of Rancher Mirage
[00:38:29] as falling within the moderate hazard
[00:38:31] classification. Notably, there are no
[00:38:34] areas within the city limits that have
[00:38:35] been designated as high or very high
[00:38:37] hazard.
[00:38:40] The Riverside County Fire Department,
[00:38:42] which provides fire protection services
[00:38:43] to Ranch Mirage, has reviewed the fire
[00:38:46] hazard severity zones map and has not
[00:38:48] recommended any changes to the
[00:38:49] designations provided by the California
[00:38:52] Department of Forestry and Fire
[00:38:53] Protection. Their assessment supports
[00:38:55] the conclusion that the moderate
[00:38:57] classification is appropriate based on
[00:38:59] current conditions. While local
[00:39:01] jurisdictions are permitted to adopt
[00:39:03] more restrictive classifications, such
[00:39:05] as reclassifying an area from moderate
[00:39:07] to high, they may not reduce a
[00:39:10] designation set by the state. Increasing
[00:39:13] a designation would also trigger
[00:39:14] additional regulatory requirements,
[00:39:16] including stricter building codes,
[00:39:18] expanded defensible space rules, and
[00:39:20] mandatory real estate disclosures. At
[00:39:23] this time, staff does not believe these
[00:39:25] increased requirements are necessary
[00:39:26] given the city's environmental
[00:39:28] conditions and fire mitigation
[00:39:30] capabilities. Accordingly, staff
[00:39:33] recommends that the city council adopt
[00:39:35] the updated fire hazard severity zones
[00:39:37] maps as provided by the California
[00:39:39] Department of Forestry and Fire
[00:39:40] Protection with no modifications or
[00:39:43] additions. This action will ensure the
[00:39:45] city's continued compliance with state
[00:39:47] regulations. There's no direct fiscal
[00:39:50] impact associated with the adoptions of
[00:39:51] the updated map. In conclusion, adopting
[00:39:54] the updated fire hazard severity zones
[00:39:56] map supports ranch commitment to public
[00:39:58] safety and wildfire preparedness while
[00:40:00] aligning with the legal requirements of
[00:40:02] the state of California. Staff are happy
[00:40:04] to answer any questions the council may
[00:40:05] have.
[00:40:07] Thank you, Tyler. Excellent
[00:40:09] presentation. And uh likewise we had an
[00:40:13] excellent presentation on this subject
[00:40:15] by CalFire at our last meeting who was
[00:40:18] here again. Thank you for your
[00:40:20] attendance today as well. Uh are there
[00:40:23] any public comments regarding this item?
[00:40:26] Yes. I have one speaker card from Brad
[00:40:27] Anderson.
[00:40:33] Hi Brad Anderson. Currently live in the
[00:40:36] city of Anarrage. I have I believe this
[00:40:39] is a public hearing item too. Uh
[00:40:42] according to agenda, I did submit some
[00:40:44] written comments uh um concerning this
[00:40:47] matter. Uh I'm all in favor of it.
[00:40:49] Again, I think Calire had no no other
[00:40:53] recourse except to do this because of
[00:40:56] Sacramento and our polit politicians or
[00:40:59] representatives that work up there. Uh
[00:41:02] it's uh it's more detail over another
[00:41:05] detail map. So, it's it's fine. Uh I
[00:41:08] just uh I made some recommendations in
[00:41:10] my written comments uh to the city uh of
[00:41:14] the risk that they have uh threats uh of
[00:41:18] possible fire or fire dangers. Um and I
[00:41:21] have I have photographs of of certain
[00:41:24] areas that I I think are heightened uh
[00:41:27] and should be uh made aware of. These
[00:41:29] are city city properties that under city
[00:41:31] control and and uh hopefully you can
[00:41:35] address those items before anything
[00:41:37] happens and that's all I have. Thank
[00:41:39] you. Thank you for your comments. Is
[00:41:41] there anyone else who would like to
[00:41:42] speak on this public hearing
[00:41:44] item? No additional speakers. Thank you.
[00:41:47] Are there any council comments regarding
[00:41:49] this item? I'd like to make one, Mr.
[00:41:50] Mayor. Yes. This plan as presented to us
[00:41:53] was also presented at the CEAG public
[00:41:55] safety committee meeting and there was
[00:41:57] extensive conversation about it amongst
[00:41:59] all the cities. But what was really
[00:42:00] important was something that we also
[00:42:02] discussed uh at our meeting was this
[00:42:05] affecting insurance rates within the
[00:42:07] state of California and the work that
[00:42:11] CalFire is doing to communicate to the
[00:42:14] insurance commission and the other
[00:42:16] agencies that help assist with keeping
[00:42:18] those rates down about this map and what
[00:42:21] are the real fire risks to property and
[00:42:24] residents. And I just want to commend
[00:42:26] CalFire for their work and advocacy on
[00:42:28] behalf of all of us because as was
[00:42:30] announced this week, State Farm is
[00:42:32] allowed to raise 18% starting in June.
[00:42:35] Uh I think it's uh 30% for rental
[00:42:38] properties uh possibly higher. And this
[00:42:41] is only going to continue to happen as
[00:42:43] the Pacific Palisades fire payouts,
[00:42:45] which I think total 30 billion as of
[00:42:48] today, uh begin to uh continue to
[00:42:51] escalate. So, I want to thank CalFire
[00:42:53] for this work and for using it uh to
[00:42:56] advocate for all the residents of this
[00:42:58] county, city, and state.
[00:43:02] Any other comments? You know, along
[00:43:04] those lines, if I may, I heard a
[00:43:07] statistic the other day that of the
[00:43:10] thousands of homes that were
[00:43:13] destroyed so far, there have been a
[00:43:16] total of
[00:43:18] seven, that's seven total building
[00:43:22] permits issued since the fire. That's
[00:43:26] how far behind they are and how
[00:43:28] difficult it is to
[00:43:30] replace. Again, I'll ask for additional
[00:43:33] comments from my
[00:43:37] colleagues. Saying none, I will ask for
[00:43:40] a motion, please. I'll make the motion,
[00:43:43] Mr.
[00:43:44] Mayor. Uh motion to introduce ordinance
[00:43:47] number next in order, first reading,
[00:43:49] adopting the fire hazard severity zones
[00:43:51] as recommended by the California
[00:43:52] Department of Forestry and Fire
[00:43:54] Protection pursuant to government code
[00:43:55] section 51178.
[00:43:58] I'll second.
[00:44:00] There's a motion in a second. Please
[00:44:02] vote.
[00:44:06] Motion carries. 5-0.
[00:44:09] Thank
[00:44:10] you. We will now go to the action
[00:44:14] calendar. And the first item
[00:44:17] 6A is solid waste and recycling
[00:44:21] collection and disposal rates. and that
[00:44:24] will be handled by Jessica Pollon, our
[00:44:28] deputy sustainability. Jessica, if you
[00:44:31] would, please. Thank you. Good
[00:44:33] afternoon, Mayor, Mayor Proim, and
[00:44:34] council members. I'm here today um
[00:44:37] seeking a resolution addressing the
[00:44:39] adjustment of solid waste and recycling
[00:44:41] collection and disposal rates for the
[00:44:43] upcoming fiscal year. As part of our
[00:44:46] annual routine, the city council reviews
[00:44:48] and sets the maximum rates using
[00:44:49] specific rate setting parameters that
[00:44:51] are outlined in our contract with BERT.
[00:44:55] I do also want to acknowledge today that
[00:44:57] we have BERT present. We have uh Clara
[00:44:59] Vera, municipal marketing manager, and
[00:45:02] Ken Stevens, district environmental
[00:45:04] coordinator. I want to thank them for
[00:45:06] being here. Um I will go ahead and go
[00:45:08] over our proposed rate changes, and then
[00:45:10] I'm going to invite Clara up to give a
[00:45:12] year in review for council.
[00:45:16] Our current contract with BERT was
[00:45:18] ratified in 2022 by council. It
[00:45:20] established the initial maximum rates
[00:45:23] for services. The setting of these rates
[00:45:25] was done doing very very thorough
[00:45:28] assessments by a contracted third party
[00:45:31] um which was hired by the city. The
[00:45:33] assessments included infilled
[00:45:35] evaluations, root audits, and a
[00:45:37] meticulous review of Bertex financial
[00:45:39] statements.
[00:45:41] Currently the standard single home in
[00:45:43] Ranch Mirage is paying 29.80 per month
[00:45:45] for twice a week walk up trash service
[00:45:47] organics collection as well as the
[00:45:49] processing of recycling as required by
[00:45:52] the state. This rate is a combination of
[00:45:55] collection processing and disposal fees
[00:45:57] which are subject to annual adjustment
[00:46:00] based on CPI a reconciliation of the
[00:46:03] previous year's actual disposal costs by
[00:46:05] BERT and commodity market pricing for
[00:46:08] recyclables.
[00:46:11] Displayed now is the proposed rate
[00:46:14] adjustment. Breaking it down, the
[00:46:16] collection component allows for an
[00:46:18] annual increase based on the CPI. Uh
[00:46:20] it's capped at 5% in our contract. So
[00:46:23] regardless if the CPI goes over this, it
[00:46:25] cannot go by more than 5% per year,
[00:46:27] which protects the cost for our
[00:46:29] residents and gives them a baseline.
[00:46:32] This year CPI increased by 2.61% 61% and
[00:46:35] this uh resulted in 68 cents increase to
[00:46:40] the collection component. The disposal
[00:46:42] fee uh which is linked to Riverside
[00:46:45] County's charges for solid waste
[00:46:47] disposal increased from
[00:46:49] $72.98 per ton to
[00:46:52] $75.83 per ton. Um this was a good size
[00:46:56] increase. Um and this came down to 57
[00:46:59] cents per customer. Overall, we've been
[00:47:02] watching this and our customers haven't
[00:47:03] seen a huge jump here because they have
[00:47:05] continued to reduce landfill volume um
[00:47:08] and using their organic. So, the green
[00:47:10] carts are being used and that is
[00:47:12] resulting that even though it costs more
[00:47:14] to get rid of the trash, we're not
[00:47:16] producing quite as much of it.
[00:47:19] Additionally, there was an increase uh
[00:47:21] to the credit that we receive of 29
[00:47:23] cents for the recyclables that are
[00:47:25] diverted, which just shows that our
[00:47:27] residents are continuing to recycle. And
[00:47:30] um you know, we're just really grateful
[00:47:31] for the continued recycling efforts by
[00:47:33] our residents. Taking all of this into
[00:47:36] account, the total residential rate will
[00:47:38] rise from the current rate of 29.80 to
[00:47:41] $30.93 per month. and this represents
[00:47:44] about a 3.7% increase uh for the
[00:47:47] standard level of residential service.
[00:47:49] Um the comprehensive listing of all the
[00:47:51] residential and commercial rates is
[00:47:53] attached as an exhibit A to the
[00:47:55] resolution. And at this time, I'd like
[00:47:57] to ask Clara to step up to the podium
[00:48:00] and she will go ahead and provide a year
[00:48:01] and review at which time um we'll then
[00:48:04] take any council questions or
[00:48:08] comments. A little shorter. Good
[00:48:11] afternoon, distinguished mayor, council
[00:48:13] members, staff, members of the audience.
[00:48:16] I'm Clara Vera, and we're going to be
[00:48:17] talking a little trash today, or
[00:48:19] organics, I should say. Um, but really,
[00:48:22] we're here to thank you for allowing us
[00:48:24] to provide services and programs to a
[00:48:27] distinguished city like Rancho Mirage.
[00:48:29] I'm also here today with Steve or Ken
[00:48:32] Stevens, who's our iconic industry. He's
[00:48:36] been your dedicated district
[00:48:37] environmental coordinator who works
[00:48:39] alongside the outstanding programs that
[00:48:42] Jessica and her team provide to our
[00:48:44] businesses and to our residents. And
[00:48:47] that collaboration together really
[00:48:49] showcases all of the information that I
[00:48:51] will provide to you today. It's that
[00:48:53] collaboration between us together that
[00:48:55] really promotes the services and
[00:48:58] programs. Um, so we're just going to
[00:49:00] have a brief presentation. I I think
[00:49:02] it's a wonderful look at the year in
[00:49:05] review of how outstanding and performing
[00:49:07] we are as a city um residents and
[00:49:10] businesses. So we'll talk about that
[00:49:13] public education and outreach and SP
[00:49:16] 1383 compliance which is a big portion
[00:49:19] of what Jessica leads along with Ken and
[00:49:22] the rest of us here. Um so big year for
[00:49:25] us 2024 year in review. This is really
[00:49:28] just meant to be a snapshot to give you
[00:49:30] an overall look at what we do out there
[00:49:32] in the community. So, residents helped
[00:49:35] divert uh
[00:49:36] 1,589 tons of organic materials from the
[00:49:40] landfill. Businesses help divert
[00:49:44] 5,829 tons of organic material from the
[00:49:47] landfill.
[00:49:49] recycling, which is our dry recycling
[00:49:51] right now with SB1383, which is the most
[00:49:55] epic environmental legislation that we
[00:49:57] have to date. Um, it's one of the most
[00:49:59] epic ones, as we've talked about over
[00:50:01] the last 5 years, that the state has
[00:50:03] produced um statewide. And so now we
[00:50:06] refer to recycling when you see the blue
[00:50:08] as dry recyclables because recycling is
[00:50:11] also diver um referred to as organics.
[00:50:14] But for the purpose of uh dry
[00:50:15] recyclables, which is your blue
[00:50:17] container, one uh
[00:50:19] 1,561 tons of recyclable materials were
[00:50:22] diverted from the landfill. Businesses
[00:50:24] helped divert
[00:50:26] 4,232 tons from the landfill. And just
[00:50:29] as a side note, um just going back to
[00:50:32] the outstanding work that Jessica and
[00:50:34] the team and the city and Bertekch does,
[00:50:36] we are up residential dry recycling from
[00:50:39] the 2023 year 10%. That is a big huge
[00:50:44] number. I know it doesn't sound like a
[00:50:45] lot, but that's probably more than the
[00:50:47] weight that I've lost over the last
[00:50:48] year. But 10% is really the number that
[00:50:51] we're going for right here. Residential
[00:50:54] organics, another big big number, which
[00:50:57] really talks about the change in the
[00:50:59] behavior in the systems and the way that
[00:51:02] our residents and our businesses are
[00:51:03] using the programs.
[00:51:06] 19% organic increase in residential
[00:51:10] behavior in that green cart which is a
[00:51:12] real big number for us here in the city
[00:51:15] and as a valley. So thank you for
[00:51:17] setting that trend the outstanding
[00:51:19] communications that are provided to our
[00:51:21] residents and our businesses because
[00:51:23] those are the numbers that we really
[00:51:24] like to see. commercial organics as
[00:51:27] well. Um commercial participation is up
[00:51:30] 47% in organics from our commercial
[00:51:33] sector which really showcases the
[00:51:35] participation and um the monitoring that
[00:51:38] like Ken does and talks to our
[00:51:40] businesses in doing the right
[00:51:42] thing. Next slide here we have our I'm
[00:51:45] sure many of us here take advantage of
[00:51:47] our bulky item curbside program. Thank
[00:51:50] you for for doing that. It really keeps
[00:51:52] our community clean and beautiful. Last
[00:51:54] year 2024 we had
[00:51:58] 5,172 services provided. Um that means
[00:52:01] that residents are really taking
[00:52:02] advantage of that bulky program which is
[00:52:05] also included in that rate. Uh recycling
[00:52:08] outreach. This is the work that the
[00:52:10] city, Jessica, um, and her team and Ken
[00:52:13] and all of us do every time that we do
[00:52:15] an assessment, which is phone, um, a
[00:52:18] direct site visit, email, contact, any
[00:52:22] kind of activity that we do to help a
[00:52:24] business reduce its impact to the
[00:52:27] landfill. We did
[00:52:30] 2,215 outreach attempts to our business
[00:52:33] community. That's outstanding. 2024, we
[00:52:36] kept 541 mattresses from hitting any one
[00:52:39] of the streets here in the community.
[00:52:42] 702 white goods. That's an old industry
[00:52:45] term if you're wondering what white
[00:52:46] goods are. Um back in the historical
[00:52:49] days, um our our laundry machines, our
[00:52:52] refrigerators were all white goods. And
[00:52:55] so for our purpose, they're all metal
[00:52:57] goods, which means that they're
[00:52:58] recyclable. So 702 white goods were also
[00:53:01] kept off of the community streets. 80
[00:53:05] sharps containers were delivered. Thank
[00:53:07] you for all the residents for ensuring
[00:53:09] that um our staff at our material
[00:53:11] recovery facility centers are kept safe
[00:53:13] by using that sharp container program.
[00:53:16] And 212 gallons of used oil. That means
[00:53:18] that we have residents who still like to
[00:53:20] enjoy to change the oils in their cars
[00:53:23] at home.
[00:53:26] Public education and outreach. This is
[00:53:28] still one of those huge impacts to the
[00:53:30] city, to residents, as it relates to
[00:53:33] Senate Bill 1383, which is a requirement
[00:53:36] to provide um not only monthly
[00:53:38] education, but quarterly, semi um
[00:53:42] semianually, and annually information to
[00:53:44] businesses as required by SP 1383. So,
[00:53:47] here you see a snapshot of of all of the
[00:53:49] outstanding um resources that we mail
[00:53:52] provide on site or email to our
[00:53:56] residents and to our
[00:53:58] businesses. And public education and
[00:54:00] outreach continued. Um city
[00:54:02] sustainability events. We've had two so
[00:54:04] far. Um, I'd like to take a moment to
[00:54:07] really thank the city of Rancho Mirage
[00:54:09] and Jessica and Ken and the team for
[00:54:12] your commitment to sustainability as a
[00:54:14] city, not only city, but regionally. You
[00:54:17] guys had one of the best Earth Day
[00:54:19] events. It was well populated. A lot of
[00:54:22] people attended. It had a special
[00:54:24] attendance by Bert the Recycler. Um I
[00:54:27] know it had a lot of great initiatives
[00:54:29] but really setting the tone for not only
[00:54:31] the city but for the region on what
[00:54:34] Earth Day means for us as residents and
[00:54:37] as businesses. Along with that, we also
[00:54:40] showcase programs such as grow together
[00:54:43] Rancho Mirage, which really creates an
[00:54:45] initiative for residents to work
[00:54:47] together and to use the compost and do
[00:54:49] gardening to go green um compost
[00:54:52] programs for businesses. And your CND
[00:54:55] program, which is one of the which is
[00:54:57] one of the finest CND programs that we
[00:54:59] have here in the valley that we work
[00:55:01] really hard for. And big kudos to the
[00:55:03] Coutino project who is at about a 64%
[00:55:07] diversion. That is incredible diversion
[00:55:10] for a construction and demolition
[00:55:12] project of that size to be at 64% and we
[00:55:15] really applaud DMB um general
[00:55:18] contractors. The work that uh Jessica
[00:55:21] and the team do in monitoring and
[00:55:23] ensuring that they're complying not only
[00:55:25] with Senate Bill 1383, but wanting to do
[00:55:28] the right thing. 64% is an incredible
[00:55:30] number for a pro for a pro a project
[00:55:34] that still is not even near completion.
[00:55:37] So big kudos to Cotino, Ken, Jessica for
[00:55:40] the work that they do in providing the
[00:55:43] consistent monitoring and communication
[00:55:45] and dedication to make sure that we
[00:55:47] divert. I I'm telling you, I'm a
[00:55:49] construction baby and to get a general
[00:55:51] contractor to to maintain that quality
[00:55:54] of diversion is u really second to none.
[00:55:56] So big kudos there. um outreach. We
[00:55:59] provide Senate Bill 1383 outreach Earth
[00:56:02] Day. Again, thank you for for setting
[00:56:04] the tone and the the exemplary programs
[00:56:07] that are model programs to a lot of our
[00:56:09] other cities. Uh recycling right holiday
[00:56:12] recycling and every new resident that we
[00:56:14] welcome into the city of Rancho Mirage
[00:56:16] is provided a welcome kit which um helps
[00:56:19] them to understand the city's new color
[00:56:21] scheme as required by Senate Bill 1383.
[00:56:24] So, they get all kinds of resources um
[00:56:27] there. And then we get to the business
[00:56:29] component factor of Senate Bill 1383.
[00:56:32] Congratulations. You continue to stay at
[00:56:35] 100% compliance in your commercial
[00:56:38] sector. And that is again a showcase of
[00:56:40] the commitment of your business
[00:56:42] partnerships, how they view your
[00:56:44] programs, and how they willingly want to
[00:56:46] participate. So, thank you um Ken for
[00:56:48] all of your extraordinary work that you
[00:56:50] do out in our shopping centers, Jessica,
[00:56:52] for the programs that you develop. Um
[00:56:54] that is a really a natural way that you
[00:56:56] really want businesses to participate in
[00:56:58] those programs. Um still lots ahead in
[00:57:01] Senate Bill 1383. Um one of the big ones
[00:57:04] that we'll work with the city and
[00:57:05] Jessica on is um recovered organic
[00:57:08] product material which is compost and
[00:57:10] mulch. Um we we are now required by the
[00:57:13] state to to um recover 100% of that
[00:57:16] mark. um we are trending to work towards
[00:57:19] that but again Senate bill is is still
[00:57:21] not gone and we are still working
[00:57:23] monthly on a lot of initiatives. Just a
[00:57:26] highlight view here of all of the
[00:57:27] resources that are provided to our
[00:57:29] residents in the last year and in in the
[00:57:31] current year. And with that, thank you
[00:57:33] for keeping the city of Rancho Mirage
[00:57:36] clean and very beautiful. Thank you.
[00:57:38] Happy to answer any questions that you
[00:57:39] may have. Thank you. Excellent
[00:57:42] presentation. Uh are there any
[00:57:45] questions? Any comments? Well, we thank
[00:57:48] you for being here. Well, thank you. You
[00:57:50] know, Bertr provides a outstanding
[00:57:53] service. We get u excellent comments
[00:57:56] from our uh from our residents and so
[00:57:59] thank you for the good service. Thank
[00:58:01] you for allowing us to serve. Of course.
[00:58:04] Thank you.
[00:58:06] Uh are there any public comments
[00:58:08] regarding Yes. Brad Anderson.
[00:58:16] Hi. Hi. Again, I'm going to have to move
[00:58:18] seats. I think uh my name is Brad
[00:58:19] Anderson. I currently live in the city
[00:58:20] of Ranch. Wanted to speak on item number
[00:58:23] 6A and that's concerning the increase
[00:58:25] for u uh trash and recycling and
[00:58:28] collection and disposal rates for the
[00:58:30] city. U I believe the presentation was
[00:58:33] 2.61% increase, but I believe it's 3.71
[00:58:37] altogether. Uh that's what I read in the
[00:58:39] report, but I could be wrong. uh uh
[00:58:43] which is I guess an increase all the
[00:58:46] same. Uh I I actually protested this uh
[00:58:50] contract when it first originated a few
[00:58:52] years ago and and since then I've had
[00:58:56] nothing but issues with the uh with the
[00:58:58] uh uh with Bert and
[00:59:01] uh just let me go. That's all I got to
[00:59:04] ask. But um I'm just
[00:59:07] uh I think I'm I'm just disappointed in
[00:59:10] the city of SB what is 1383 I believe. I
[00:59:14] used to know that by heart but um it's
[00:59:17] just uh it's extreme. It's an extreme
[00:59:19] piece of legislation out of Sacramento
[00:59:22] and and and I think the county is not
[00:59:24] even on board yet. So I I believe the
[00:59:26] city really didn't have to enter that
[00:59:28] contract so readily as they did and
[00:59:31] which costs everybody in the city just
[00:59:34] millions of dollars including equipment
[00:59:36] for Burk and we got tipping fees too for
[00:59:39] the county. So everything's gone up.
[00:59:41] Everything's always going to go up. Um I
[00:59:43] applaud anybody that compost. I actually
[00:59:46] do it and um I've been very successful
[00:59:48] and uh I'm just amazed how easy it is.
[00:59:51] So uh uh so anyway um I guess I just
[00:59:55] wanted to bring that attention to
[00:59:56] everybody that lives in the city.
[00:59:58] There's going to be an increase. Palm
[00:59:59] Desert had an increase a few years ago
[01:00:02] which they really did tell the residents
[01:00:04] about. Um but um so that's it. Thank you
[01:00:08] very much for allowing me to speak.
[01:00:10] Thank you. That was the only speaker
[01:00:12] card. Is there anyone else who would
[01:00:14] like to speak on this item? That was the
[01:00:16] only speaker.
[01:00:18] Okay. I'll ask for any council comments
[01:00:20] regarding this item if I may. Thank you.
[01:00:24] I'd like to thank Bertech for their
[01:00:26] continued partnership with the city of
[01:00:28] Ranch Mirage in keeping us flying
[01:00:31] straight in the stewardship in
[01:00:33] sustainability. Um Ken, thank you for
[01:00:36] being at I believe were you at our Earth
[01:00:39] Day? Yes, you were. So, uh overheard a
[01:00:43] lot of residents making comments on that
[01:00:46] particular day. It was nice to see not
[01:00:48] only uh representation from the farmers
[01:00:51] market and and a variety of
[01:00:53] representation but specifically the
[01:00:55] partnership that the city has with
[01:00:58] rancher mirage. So we appreciate all
[01:01:00] your efforts. We thank you for your hard
[01:01:02] work with Jessica and u look forward to
[01:01:05] the future.
[01:01:07] Thank you Mayor
[01:01:09] Prom. Any other comments? I do Mr.
[01:01:11] Mayor. So first Clara thank you uh for
[01:01:14] being here today to as you say talk
[01:01:15] trash. So thanks for that. Um so I do re
[01:01:19] want to remind everybody and I thought I
[01:01:20] think Clara talked briefly about it that
[01:01:22] the state of California has instituted
[01:01:24] some fairly significant regulations with
[01:01:27] respect to the collection and separation
[01:01:28] of trash which resulted in significant
[01:01:31] expense for BERT uh in terms of barrels
[01:01:34] that we all now have as we know three
[01:01:36] barrels in our at our homes to collect
[01:01:38] various kinds of of uh refues. And of
[01:01:41] course, uh, BERT also had to spend
[01:01:42] considerable amount of of money to
[01:01:44] retrofit trucks to pick up those
[01:01:46] different barrels. And they also had to
[01:01:48] find a way to institute a different
[01:01:50] collection cycling. So, uh, all of us in
[01:01:53] this city now have two collection
[01:01:55] cycling, one for regular trash and the
[01:01:57] other for uh either uh recycle or for u
[01:02:01] for composting. So uh so I salute uh
[01:02:04] Bertech and the city for doing our best
[01:02:05] to find ways uh to control costs uh as
[01:02:10] uh as the uh requirement to conform with
[01:02:13] these state requirements uh has become
[01:02:16] quite expensive over the years. So thank
[01:02:18] you for for being here to talk trash uh
[01:02:20] and thank you for your relationship with
[01:02:21] the city. That's all I have, Mr. Mayor.
[01:02:23] Thank you. Thank you, Council Member DS.
[01:02:26] Uh uh city
[01:02:28] manager has a comment about this. Yeah,
[01:02:32] I just wanted to brag on our staff for a
[01:02:34] second. Uh so Cal Recycle is the state
[01:02:36] agency that oversees uh our compliance
[01:02:41] with uh all the recycling rules and uh
[01:02:44] SB 1383, which was a very significant uh
[01:02:48] change uh to how we recycle and what
[01:02:51] we're recycling. And so, uh, Cal Recycle
[01:02:55] reached out and they asked our staff to
[01:02:57] come present to other cities as a model
[01:03:00] for our implementation. And so, I just
[01:03:03] wanted to, uh, congratulate Jessica,
[01:03:06] Jess, and Ken. Uh, it is a nice blend
[01:03:09] between your city staff and our service
[01:03:12] provider. And uh it's not only
[01:03:15] recognized locally within the numbers uh
[01:03:17] that was just shared, but also the state
[01:03:20] regulatory agency uh recognized it as
[01:03:23] well and is having them come present
[01:03:24] what they do so that hopefully other
[01:03:26] cities will copy it. So great job. Well,
[01:03:30] let me say this. Your bra is more than
[01:03:33] justified and uh I've commented
[01:03:36] before. Uh, I hope Jessica's head
[01:03:38] doesn't gets too too swelled, but um,
[01:03:43] uh, she takes an awful lot of u, a load
[01:03:46] off of us on the city council when it
[01:03:49] comes to questions regarding uh, whether
[01:03:52] it be trash, uh, energy or any of those
[01:03:55] areas. Um, we defer immediately
[01:04:00] uh, to her. our uh our lack of ignorance
[01:04:04] is made up by her efficiency and makes
[01:04:07] us look very good. So again, Jessica,
[01:04:10] thank you loads. Uh any other
[01:04:14] comments? Uh if not, I'll entertain a
[01:04:17] motion, please. I'll be happy to make
[01:04:19] the motion, Mr. Mayor. So, I uh propose
[01:04:21] that the council adopt resolution number
[01:04:23] 2025 next in order establishing solid
[01:04:26] waste and recycling collection and
[01:04:27] disposal rates for all classes of
[01:04:29] customers within the jurisdiction of the
[01:04:31] city of Ranch Mirage effective July 1,
[01:04:34] 2025.
[01:04:36] I'll second. There's a motion and a
[01:04:38] second. Please vote.
[01:04:42] Motion carries. 5-0.
[01:04:45] Excellent.
[01:04:48] Looks to me like we might have a change
[01:04:50] of uh
[01:04:52] uh well, let me let me say this.
[01:04:57] Um the uh the next item is the fiscal
[01:05:02] year 20
[01:05:04] 2526 levy of assessments for landscaping
[01:05:07] and lighting
[01:05:09] uh maintenance district number 87-01.
[01:05:14] It was going to be presented by Ryan
[01:05:17] Stendelle, our assistant manager, city
[01:05:20] manager. I don't see him necessarily
[01:05:24] sitting in the crow's nest seat. So, uh,
[01:05:28] assistant manager, how are you going to
[01:05:29] handle it? Uh, thank you, honorable
[01:05:31] mayor. I'd be happy to have Lassley, our
[01:05:34] assistant public works director, who
[01:05:36] shoulders the load on this item, uh,
[01:05:38] take the staff report. Uh, I was uh
[01:05:41] hoping you would use the title that
[01:05:42] Isaiah had teed up for me today, but
[01:05:44] we'll we'll just get to Ian's talk. And
[01:05:47] by the way, Ian, you look good in a
[01:05:49] suit. Oh, thank you very much.
[01:05:55] Okay. Uh, good afternoon, mayor and city
[01:05:57] council members. The item before you
[01:05:59] today is the initiation of the levy
[01:06:00] process for fiscal year 2025 and 2026
[01:06:04] for the city's landscape and lighting
[01:06:06] districts. The city currently maintains
[01:06:08] five special benefit zones which were
[01:06:10] established through development
[01:06:11] agreements between property developers
[01:06:13] and the city as well as one citywide
[01:06:16] median zone under landscape and lighting
[01:06:18] district
[01:06:20] 87-01. These districts exist for the
[01:06:24] purpose of maintaining landscaping and
[01:06:25] lighting within their respective zones.
[01:06:28] Each Jo zone is assessed on a cost
[01:06:30] recovery basis with parcel owners being
[01:06:32] assessed only for the maintenance costs
[01:06:35] specific to their zone. The citywide
[01:06:38] zone which covers all medians within the
[01:06:40] city is assessed to all parcel owners
[01:06:42] citywide. In contrast, five special
[01:06:44] benefit zones have are assessed solely
[01:06:47] to the parcels that receive direct and
[01:06:49] special benefits from improvements and
[01:06:51] maintenance. The engineers annual levy
[01:06:54] report provides a detailed breakdown of
[01:06:57] the revenues and expenses for each zone
[01:06:59] and outlines cost recovery estimates for
[01:07:01] each. This report includes is included
[01:07:04] in your presentation package. The
[01:07:07] recommendations contained in the
[01:07:08] engineers report are based on full cost
[01:07:11] recovery for each model zone. Staff
[01:07:14] recommends that city council approve the
[01:07:16] attached resolutions declaring the
[01:07:18] city's intent to levy assessments
[01:07:20] setting and setting a public hearing
[01:07:22] date for June 5th, 2025. This concludes
[01:07:25] my presentation. I'd be happy to answer
[01:07:26] any questions you might have.
[01:07:29] Thank you. Are there any public
[01:07:31] comments? Yes, Brad Anderson.
[01:07:39] Great. Thank you again, Brad Anderson.
[01:07:40] Uh currently live in the city. I wanted
[01:07:43] to speak on action item 6B. Um uh I have
[01:07:48] submitted written comments like I said
[01:07:49] before uh for everything that I'm
[01:07:51] speaking on today. Um more detailed uh
[01:07:54] than I'm going to in my 3 minutes or two
[01:07:59] minutes or one minute uh of speaking. Um
[01:08:02] this item here, I just hopefully uh the
[01:08:04] residents in those uh special benefit
[01:08:07] assessment districts
[01:08:09] uh uh from ourselves or just um I can't
[01:08:13] even talk today. I'm sorry. I don't talk
[01:08:15] to anybody usually. Uh but uh uh just uh
[01:08:19] I'm I'm concerned of maybe the city
[01:08:22] having other um items on those light
[01:08:25] poles and on the city rightways and and
[01:08:28] items such as surveillance devices,
[01:08:31] automatic license plate recognition
[01:08:33] cameras and so forth. Not that they do,
[01:08:36] but if they do have any devices uh
[01:08:38] sponsored by the city, could be for any
[01:08:40] other department or or county sheriff or
[01:08:43] fire or anything like that that uh the
[01:08:46] the the people that pay that benefit
[01:08:48] assessment are aware of that so they can
[01:08:50] make adjustments to their bill uh of any
[01:08:53] or any type of service work that's done
[01:08:56] on those devices. And that's all I have.
[01:08:57] Thank you. Thank you for your comment.
[01:09:00] Is there anyone else who would like to
[01:09:01] speak? That was the only speaker.
[01:09:04] Thank you. Uh I will now ask for any
[01:09:08] council comments regarding this
[01:09:12] item. Seeing none, uh I'll call for a
[01:09:15] motion.
[01:09:17] I'll make the motion that number one, we
[01:09:20] adopt the resolution number 2025 next in
[01:09:23] order initiating proceedings for the
[01:09:25] annual levy of assessments for the ranch
[01:09:28] consolidated landscaping and lighting
[01:09:30] maintenance assessment district number
[01:09:33] 87-01 for fiscal year 25 2025
[01:09:37] 2026 and number two adopt resolution
[01:09:40] number 2025 next in order declaring its
[01:09:43] intention to levy annual assessments for
[01:09:46] the Rancher Mirage Consolidated
[01:09:48] Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance
[01:09:50] Assessment District number
[01:09:52] 87-01 for fiscal year 2025 2026 and
[01:09:58] three adopt resolution number 2025.
[01:10:01] Next, in order for preliminary approval
[01:10:03] of the engineers annual levy report for
[01:10:06] the ranch consolidated landscaping and
[01:10:08] lighting maintenance assessment district
[01:10:10] number
[01:10:11] 87-01 for fiscal year 2025 2026.
[01:10:16] I'll second. There is a motion and a
[01:10:19] second. Please vote.
[01:10:23] Motion carries 5.
[01:10:27] That uh con completes the um
[01:10:31] uh the action calendar. I will now go to
[01:10:34] non-aggenda public
[01:10:36] comments. Uh if you would Christie.
[01:10:41] Thank you. This is the time for anyone
[01:10:42] to speak on something that is not on
[01:10:44] today's agenda. First speaker is Brad
[01:10:46] Anderson.
[01:10:53] Hello again Brad Anderson. Uh city of
[01:10:55] Marage. I want to speak on number seven
[01:10:57] now as non-aggenda public comments and I
[01:11:00] just want to voice my concerns again
[01:11:02] about this item being moved towards the
[01:11:04] end of the meeting versus where it's
[01:11:06] always always always been at the
[01:11:08] beginning of the meeting since the
[01:11:09] meeting since the city's constructed the
[01:11:11] city since the city's been constructed
[01:11:13] and since you had uh public uh meetings
[01:11:17] of this nature uh so I think it's a
[01:11:21] political aspect to silence to people
[01:11:23] but I don't know that for sure I would
[01:11:25] highly you suggest if maybe the uh
[01:11:27] council comments be towards the end of
[01:11:29] the meeting if not at the end of the
[01:11:30] meeting before close session like other
[01:11:32] items or I think county does that uh and
[01:11:35] that way maybe that could you know be uh
[01:11:39] another effective way to censor
[01:11:41] everybody but u that being set aside I
[01:11:45] wanted to speak
[01:11:48] on oh at a at a recent city council
[01:11:51] meeting Mr. DS reported or or stated
[01:11:54] that council member DS stated that uh
[01:11:57] only one person uh can bring any agenda
[01:12:01] uh any item to be set for agenda agenda
[01:12:05] wise I guess on any any public meeting
[01:12:08] council meetings and I never knew that
[01:12:10] that was news to me and I appreciate you
[01:12:12] being so candid to release that. I am
[01:12:15] concerned I have written statements too
[01:12:17] of this what I'm speaking about today
[01:12:20] but I am concerned about maybe the
[01:12:22] possible um I want to say corruption but
[01:12:24] that's too strong a word I think maybe
[01:12:27] three people three council members
[01:12:29] should really have an open discussion
[01:12:31] towards the end of the meeting when
[01:12:33] council comments are stated if that's
[01:12:35] something that's going to happen and
[01:12:37] they could suggest that an open public
[01:12:39] forum of putting things I think uh Palm
[01:12:42] Springs does it that way Palm Springs
[01:12:43] city council
[01:12:44] uh and allow u public public to uh
[01:12:49] uh I guess review what the city council
[01:12:51] is doing and having more than one
[01:12:53] council person bring something to agenda
[01:12:56] uh means uh it's more transparent is the
[01:13:00] word I'm using uh but uh while I'm
[01:13:02] thinking of it really quick u I noticed
[01:13:04] uh I did go on your website I did look
[01:13:07] up an address for cell coverage and
[01:13:09] apparently where I live there's no good
[01:13:11] cell coverage according to your map uh
[01:13:13] which I'd have to disagree with, but I
[01:13:16] see a lot of disclaimers on that uh that
[01:13:20] web page, too. And those are the same
[01:13:22] disclaimers that I put uh in public
[01:13:24] form. Not that it will be recorded
[01:13:26] anywhere, but I I brought up those uh
[01:13:29] comments too. So, uh so I think maybe
[01:13:33] you should let people Well, you have I
[01:13:35] guess if you go to those websites, but
[01:13:37] that that's one item that I wanted to
[01:13:39] address and that's I guess that's really
[01:13:41] it. And uh thank you. Thank you, Wally
[01:14:06] Melendez. Uh, good afternoon, uh, city
[01:14:09] council.
[01:14:10] um um
[01:14:15] administration. I'd like to start
[01:14:18] with a a re uh re
[01:14:22] reiteration of somebody
[01:14:26] somewhere adding to the pledge of
[01:14:29] allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the
[01:14:32] flag of the I pledge allegiance to the
[01:14:37] and the constitution of the United
[01:14:40] States of America.
[01:14:49] And so the words that caught my
[01:14:52] attention at the
[01:14:55] beginning
[01:14:56] was the um housing
[01:15:01] authority and um so
[01:15:07] uh to re reiterate again from other
[01:15:11] times I mentioned
[01:15:14] And that in instead of a rental
[01:15:18] agreement that
[01:15:19] the that housing to be
[01:15:24] uh made available
[01:15:27] to homeless
[01:15:31] people that that there would be one way
[01:15:34] for homeless people to get up in the
[01:15:37] world.
[01:15:39] Of course, what I'm talking
[01:15:42] about is probably a partnership with
[01:15:45] government and uh private enterprise uh
[01:15:49] to make uh to to to work up that uh that
[01:15:58] project. So, so, so, so you get my
[01:16:00] drift. government and private
[01:16:02] partnership to
[01:16:04] provide listen very
[01:16:08] carefully
[01:16:09] equity participatory agreements instead
[01:16:14] of I know I'm saying this again I know
[01:16:17] I'm repeating myself instead of rational
[01:16:21] agreements to uh help people get up from
[01:16:25] the from the poverty hole that they're
[01:16:28] in and I want to re and and and and to
[01:16:33] add to
[01:16:34] that, I I think that Raj
[01:16:39] Mirage should start a
[01:16:43] university beginning with a school of
[01:16:47] law.
[01:16:51] Because as we all
[01:16:55] know, even if you're just talking about
[01:16:58] agreements, that's part of the
[01:17:01] law.
[01:17:03] So that's what I want to leave you with.
[01:17:07] So that that's the words that caught my
[01:17:09] attention today. At the beginning, the
[01:17:12] housing authority. There you go.
[01:17:17] Thank you for your comments. Is there
[01:17:19] anyone else who would like to speak on
[01:17:21] something not on today's agenda? That
[01:17:23] was the last speaker.
[01:17:27] Okay, that concludes the
[01:17:31] um the non-aggenda public
[01:17:33] comments. We are going to uh recess to a
[01:17:37] close session. Mr. Mayor, we have a
[01:17:40] request to speak on the close session.
[01:17:42] Okay. Brad Anderson.
[01:17:53] Thank you again, Brad Anderson, city of
[01:17:54] Answer. I'm losing my voice. I'm talking
[01:17:56] so much today. So anyway, uh just
[01:17:59] concerning a close session topic of I
[01:18:01] guess employee uh city manager
[01:18:04] uh performance uh evaluation from the
[01:18:08] city council. Um I think this happens
[01:18:11] every year. Uh I I would hope that this
[01:18:13] year maybe we can have a more open
[01:18:15] process. uh meaning uh transparency. Uh
[01:18:20] I think the vector control district has
[01:18:22] a more transparent way of knowing how
[01:18:24] the city managers evaluated from the
[01:18:26] city council and uh how that process is
[01:18:30] completed and uh and and that would be
[01:18:33] just enlightening for people like me
[01:18:35] that uh don't know what goes on in those
[01:18:38] close session meetings. And um and I I'm
[01:18:42] guessing this is what's going to be
[01:18:43] talked about. I have it in front of me,
[01:18:45] but I didn't hear the report again uh
[01:18:48] this week uh prior to me being uh
[01:18:52] instructed to submit my comments and
[01:18:54] vert comments. Um so I'm guessing that's
[01:18:57] what you're going to talk about. I'll
[01:18:58] wait to hear what the city attorney has
[01:19:01] to say. Uh but uh I just want to I guess
[01:19:04] a more transparent process. Uh and and
[01:19:08] I'm all for paying people well that live
[01:19:10] here and operate or work in the city. uh
[01:19:13] but we need to know what they do and how
[01:19:15] they do it and what the goals are and
[01:19:17] achievements and and all that aspects uh
[01:19:19] before we just randomly uh give money
[01:19:22] away and that's all I have or just give
[01:19:24] money away is the wrong word to u
[01:19:27] reimburse people what they're worth.
[01:19:28] Thank you. Thank you.
[01:19:32] Is there any other speakers? No
[01:19:35] additional speakers.
[01:19:37] All right.
[01:19:38] Um before we go into close session, I
[01:19:41] will ask our council to review those
[01:19:44] items under
[01:19:45] consideration. Thank you, mayor. We'll
[01:19:47] be convening in a close session for the
[01:19:49] item before you listed as 8A, conference
[01:19:52] with legal council public employee
[01:19:53] performance evaluation pursuant to
[01:19:55] California government code section
[01:19:58] 54957, public employee being city
[01:20:01] manager/executive director.
[01:20:04] Thank you. We're We are now recessed
[01:20:07] into close
[01:20:18] session. We are back in session. Uh I
[01:20:22] will now ask the city attorney to review
[01:20:25] anything that was covered in the close
[01:20:27] of session. Thank you, mayor. No
[01:20:30] reportable action taken today.
[01:20:32] That concludes the meeting is now
[01:20:36] closed.